Getting Paid to Post Ads on FacebookBe paid to place ads on Facebook.
Being paid to place ads on Facebook (LEGIT & PAYING) - Online businesses
An enjoyable Friday mornin' for all of you, there's a website that only pays you to post ads on Facebook and other social networking websites, it's free to join, although the program has an option to update either with $1, $5, $10 etc. in order to make more money, but that's if you want and if you don't have that, the website updates you automaticly if you only get 10 leads and you still pay......
Everything you do is sign up, get your banner with your links and post it, it's as straightforward as that. It' as straightforward as posting Facebook ads in 25-50 Facebook groups per tag! Promoting the program:
Want to get paid for your Facebook updates? Facebook explores new monetization options
If you could get paid to publish things on Facebook? No brand contents or branding messaging - what if there was a way for you to create a following by just publishing things you like and your Facebook audiences are interested in? Or at least for Facebook's first research into a social network planning that opens up new ways for individuals to earn cash with their Facebook use.
Verge gained entry to a Facebook poll that was sent to a number of verifiable Facebook surfers who asked a series of simple open ended user queries about how they would use Facebook and what choices they would like to see. There are a few things you should keep in mind here: "Revenue sharings (get a portion of the revenues that will be earned through ads in your post)" Well, there are a few things you should keep in mind.
First, this was sent only to verifiable people - i.e. VIPs or those who have or follow a significant attendance to have real supporters, not just the ordinary one. Second, this is just a survey, it doesn't mean Facebook's is about to launch a new monetisation opportunity for facebook profiling, they may just test the water and see what resonance they get, especially from high level people - although the fact that the survey has made it this far to be passed on to everyone suggests there is something to it.
Casey Newton is speculating that the options are likely to be taken into consideration in the broader Facebook approach to promoting real-time gaming - Facebook has recently made a major shift to the Facebook portable application to put more weight on Facebook living contents, and they have added other real-time detection utilities such as the Sports Stadium to increase exposure to online gaming happenings.
Of course, Twitter has long had access to reality, and Facebook has undoubtedly pushed the microblog behemoth into its own territories, but given the data protection limitations of Facebook and the closet networking, it's not yet likely that it can correspond to Twitter's real-time and rapid flow of interactions at the present juncture. Interestingly, Facebook has been working to get more prominent people to use Facebook Live, with stories that Sheryl Sandberg met with Los Angeles based talented agents last week to discuss the value of the options and even investigate the money back to them.
When Facebook can get more high-profile people to post high-impact material that is attractive to a wider public, it will increase the value of Facebook in the eye of audiences and other authors, who will be able to present their material alongside these high-impact contributions and make it accessible to a wider public.
Correctly done, Facebook could make Facebook a real TV competitor, a whole new entertaining choice - but to do that, they need more folks to see more TV shows, to get creatives and marketers more interested in the choice. Against this backdrop, the notion that Facebook offers more opportunities for VIPs to make cash with their Facebook activities makes a lot of sense because if these high-profile Facebook players can make cash with their Facebook activities, they will be more likely to publish more online experiences and bring more Facebook players to use.
Meanwhile, another reflection in this regard, recent news stories have proposed that less individuals share facebook contributions, with The Information reported that the general release on the 5 networks dropped. between mid-2014 and mid-2015, with the proportion of individual contributions - people's own thoughts and photographs - declining by a huge 21% over this time.
Facebook proposes to put together a Facebook staff to counter this drop, which they have called a "contextual collapse," underscoring how seriously they take it. Facebook is particularly affected by such a drop, given that the information entered by Facebook visitors is what drives their increasingly high-performance ad and target machines. When the share declines, the value of Facebook declines over time.
Whilst the concept of encouraging individuals to post, as hinted at in this poll, at this point only points to validated members, one could think that if these decreases in face -to-face share persist, Facebook could also consider the introduction of the same tool for ordinary members, giving individuals more reasons to get an actively Facebook brand.
However, the notion of a "tip jar" system poses a lot of concern and complexity, and it would be hard for Facebook to actually start and broadly monitor such a system. Sure it would stimulate action on the site, but I could see it being accompanied by a number of issues with its contents and follow-up stories, giving folks a way to make a living by publishing things on Facebook.
In light of this, I question whether Facebook has designed such a scheme beyond validated accounts - but maybe they have. Of course, as Newton mentions, there are other plattforms that already provide opportunities for the user to earn revenues from their activities on the plattform. YouTube has had a revenues share scheme since 2007, while the Twitch gambling community also has a revenues share scheme.
Arrangements like this have led to the emergence of superstar performers in popular sports networks like PlayDiePie, who allegedly made more than $12 million last year alone, and such a trial could definitely work on Facebook, especially when it comes to videos. So why not make available a means by which the user can not only use basic skills and commentaries?
There are many different kinds of complexity, but the fact that Facebook even asks the questions is interesting. Might this be the involvement of Facebook to counter the drop in face-to-face updating?